Rev. Jamie Washam Testifies for Legalization in Rhode Island

Rev. Saeed Richardson Protestant Perspectives, RI

The following is a transcript of the testimony provided by Rev. Jamie Washam before the House Judiciary Committee of the  Rhode Island General Assembly. Video of the testimony is available via YouTube. I am a pastor and minister of First Baptist Church in America, the church founded by Roger Williams in 1638, and I’m here in support of House Bill 5555. When Roger Williams founded Rhode Island, he initiated a lively experiment. He afforded legal protection for concepts that were seen as heretical at the time, which we now embrace as rights in a common and dignified society. In the 1633 colonial charter on display in this statehouse, Rhode Island was established as a place of religious liberty and freedom of conscience. It is in this spirit that I stand in reforming our existing drug policies. One need not use marijuana or even approve of marijuana to see that our current laws are ineffective and unjust. It is time to move beyond a culture of punishment to one that reduces harm, respects and restores the dignity of all persons, and re-establishes Rhode Island as an example to other communities. We have the opportunity here in Rhode Island to be the first state in the union to pass legalization through legislative action. I urge you to stop tabling this for further study. It’s been studied. I urge you to bring this to a vote this session. The War on Drugs has failed in its stated objectives. Its legacy is one of broken communities, missed opportunities, and overextended criminal justice systems. People charged with marijuana charges continue to face lifetime consequences in terms of housing and job prospects. The proposed legislation in House Bill 5555 would allow for the expungement of criminal records. It would free up people who have already paid their debt to society to get on with their lives. We know that institutional racism infects our criminal justice system. From its inception, the War on Drugs sought to conflate race and crime in the public mind for political purposes. Current policies only continue to perpetuate this injustice and these lies. Black Rhode Islanders are two-and-a-half-times more likely to be arrested for marijuana offenses even though usage rates are the same across racial lines. Even with the enactment of decriminalization, there were still more than 1400 marijuana-related arrests in the state from 2013 to 2014. It’s disingenuous to suggest that you can possess something while it’s still illegal to procure it. Even making the argument for decriminalization is nonsensical. We know that if [individuals have marijuana], they have procured it illegally, so there’s always going to exist a market of people who are subject to the criminal justice system. Legalizing and regulating would address a lot of the issues about access for youth. It would make our communities safer. Illegal marijuana is the foundation for criminal markets that operate in every community in our state. A regulated market will protect our young people and other citizens in ways that prohibition, or even decriminalization, cannot. When people of any age seek to purchase marijuana in the underground market, they are often exposed to and encouraged to purchase far more dangerous substances. Legalization breaks the link between marijuana and more dangerous drugs by shifting sales of marijuana out of the criminal market and into regulated businesses that check IDs for age and will generate needed tax revenue for health and educational services. Marijuana use is a matter of public health and not criminal justice. I’m a follower of Jesus, and as I read scripture, Jesus never threatened arrests and jail. He reached out, he listened. He spoke about mercy, about forgiveness, healing, and reconciliation. As civil rights author and lawyer Bryan Stevenson observed this past Saturday, here in Rhode Island, “If you saw an alcoholic go into a bar, you wouldn’t call the police, you’d call their sponsor.” And so I urge you to treat this as the health issue that it is, not a criminal justice issue. It’s time for Rhode Island to move beyond unhelpful and punitive measures and create a more just and effective drug policy. A regulated drug market reduces crime and allows our police and court system to focus on much more urgent priorities. My faith calls me to pursue the respect and dignity of all persons. It’s time to regulate and tax marijuana in the same ways we currently regulate and tax alcohol, and to stop the shaming that goes along with it.

Marijuana: From Gateway to Gatekeeper

Rev. Saeed Richardson Legalization, Protestant Perspectives, Reflections

On March 15, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions shared with reporters in Richmond, VA that he was, “astonished to hear people suggest that we can solve our heroin crisis by legalizing marijuana.” He concluded that the ultimate responsibility for our country was to declare that “using drugs will destroy your life.” An article published in March by the Drug and Alcohol Dependence journal presents evidence to the contrary. The study found a 23% reduction of opioid-related hospitalizations after nine states passed legislation enabling the use of medical marijuana. Additionally, overall opioid-specific overdoses were reduced by 13%.

Asset Forfeiture = Theft

Rev. Saeed Richardson Ending Forfeiture Seizure, IL, Protestant Perspectives

In November of 2015, the Washington Post reported that in the previous year law enforcement had taken more property from people – including cash, automobiles, and even homes – than burglars had stolen. Burglary losses amounted to $3.5 billion, while, shockingly, the net asset of police seizures amounted to $4.5 billion. (via The Institute for Justice) More disturbingly, this number reflected only federal statistics, and not seizures by state police and local law enforcement, data that in most cases is extremely difficult to obtain. Law enforcement utilizes a practice known as civil asset forfeiture to permanently confiscate property they perceive to be involved in criminal activity. This is done without requiring officers to prove the person or the property is guilty and/or connected to criminal activity. The process to reclaim one’s property in the event of seizure is legally complex, expensive, and time-sensitive, making the extreme majority of assets logistically impossible for most people to reclaim. Furthermore, law enforcement is inherently incentivized to persist the practice as all funds obtained through asset forfeiture are re-directed to the operating budgets of their respective departments.

2016: The Year of the Scapegoat

Rev. Alexander E. Sharp Protestant Perspectives, Reflections 8002 Comments

Regardless of our politics, surely we can agree that 2016 was a brutal year.   What made it so ugly were the steady expressions of hatred against every imaginable group  – African Americans, Mexicans, Muslims, Middle-Eastern refugees, Asians, LGBTQs – and a litany of others.  It is not an exaggeration to brand 2016 as “The Year of the Scapegoat.”   We use here theologian René Girard’s definition of scapegoating: “the strange process through which two or more people are reconciled at the expense of a third party or who appears responsible for whatever ails, disturbs, or frightens the scapegoats.”  

Scapegoating and Violence: Understanding René Girard

Rev. Katherine B. Ray Protestant Perspectives 3260 Comments

I have a confession: I have harbored an instinctive aversion to René Girard since the first time I read his seminal work Violence and the Sacred.  I resist sweeping theories that attempt to account for the entire nature and destiny of humankind.  It seems like an arrogant enterprise.  So when right-wing, millennial commentator Tomi Lahren tells Daily Show host Trevor Noah that Black Lives Matter is the new KKK, I took it like a kick to the stomach.   The first reason is because it seems unconscionable to compare a protest group to a network of individuals that systematically terrorized, raped, tortured, and murdered African Americans for over a century.  The second reason is because it forced me to concede, and not for the first time, that Girard got a few things right.  Viewed through his theory of scapegoating, Lahren’s theory, while still outrageous, also makes complete sense.  Furthermore, Girard’s theory of Christ offers insight into how I, outraged as I am, might respond both to Lahren and the reactionary culture that birthed her.      Two key concepts are essential to Girard’s thought: mimesis and scapegoating.  Even if philosophy is not your cup of tea, once you grasp these two concepts, you are well on your way to having a functioning Girardian lens.  Let’s begin with mimesis: